Adrian Paul’s PEACE Fund needs your help for some helping celebrity hands

Most of my writing here is about fictional heroes, and sometimes those heroes find ways to fight the good fight in the real world, too.

During my travels as a writer about (and a fan of) such heroism, I’ve had the honor to befriend and often work with Adrian Paul, whom most of you know as Duncan MacLeod from the Highlander TV series (and two of the movies). Truly one of the kindest and hardest working people I’ve ever met.

The most rewarding of that work has been for his charity, the PEACE Fund, which he founded to Protect, Educate, and Aid Children Everywhere.

Our newest fundraising initiative is called Celebs4Kids, and you can read more about it by clicking the link.

The concept is simple. Celebrities at conventions, concerts, or other public events can get their photo snapped flashing the “peace” sign, and fans can download the photos in exchange for a donation to the Fund.

So how do YOU come in? In most cases, YOU are the photographer. If you get a chance to meet your favorite celebrity, you can take a photo and submit it to the site (with their permission and the proper release form, of course) along with your story of meeting them and getting the picture.

It’s a quick, fun, easy way to raise money for children around the world who need it, and you can check out a gallery of all the celebrities who’ve contributed so far.

Spread the word! And thank you.

Regarding STAR WARS on Blu-ray

Yeah, these came out back in September. I figured it was time to reprint what I wrote then for Impact, because that’s how not on top of things I am these days:

“Own Every Moment,” declares the advertising campaign for the new Star Wars: The Complete Saga and individual (Original and Prequel) trilogy Blu-ray releases. Well, every moment except those tinkered with or banished entirely to the darkest, dankest corners of the dungeons under creator George Lucas’s Skywalker Ranch.

Let’s be very clear here: the films have never looked or sounded this good for home video. That being said, many things could have been done better for a more satisfying overall experience. Either way, these releases are from “complete,” with just enough material left off (including the much-sought-after original theatrical versions) to make another money-grabbing HD release all but inevitable.

Let’s get the prequels out of the way first.

The video for Episodes II and III looks fantastic; Attack of the Clones looks softer and less defined than the stunning digital imagery of Revenge of the Sith, though Attack in particular is light years ahead of its murky old DVD counterpart. Both of these were shot digitally, while The Phantom Menace was shot primarily on film. But instead of allowing it to maintain its original look, Lucasfilm wiped away so much of the film grain that gave the image its detail that faces now look waxy and unnatural. Rather than being able to count every hair in Liam Neeson’s beard, his long mane and facial hair now often look like molded pieces of plastic snapped to his head and face. Though it’s obvious that Lucas was trying to get the look of Episode I to match the digital sheen of Attack and Revenge, the grain removal went more than a few midi-chlorians too far.

The most controversial additions and decisions occur in the Original Trilogy, which looks mostly stunning but deserved better than the half-hearted HD treatment it gets in this set, which uses the same masters made eight years ago for the DVDs. While visionary science fiction contemporaries like Alien and Blade Runner both got brand new, carefully restored, state-of-the-art 4K (4096×2160) scans for their Blu-ray releases, these Star Wars masters were only done at 1920×1080, which was adequate eight years ago but no longer acceptable by today’s standards. The color-timing was also considerably off, resulting in an image that was often too dark and too blue. Black crush, which describes black levels so dark that fine detail is lost, robbed previously seen details from star-fields and Darth Vader’s cape and armor. The icy white planet of Hoth was suddenly very blue, and numerous other shots throughout the trilogy looked less vibrant than on previous home video releases. While some selective bits have been newly color-corrected, the operative word is “selective,” resulting in a picture that’s frustratingly inconsistent, sometimes within the same scenes. (The still images used for chapter selection markers in the menu look brighter and better than in the actual films.)

Lucasfilm held a late-summer press conference last year to show off many of the fixes they’d made for the Blu-rays, touting all the time and effort they’d put into the release and their multiple layers of quality control. But it was all for show. One of the most famous color-timing mistakes from the 2004 DVDs was that Luke’s blue lightsaber on the Millennium Falcon in Episode IV was suddenly green. For the Blu-rays, the saber has been fixed — but in only the one shot Lucasfilm used to show off their “commitment to quality control.” Throughout the rest of that scene, the saber remains a hazy green. Other lightsabers that had their hot white cores replaced by bubble-gum colours have been restored, but only in certain shots. Many of these corrections are more gaudy and conspicuous than had they simply been left alone.

Other fixes were made just as haphazardly. When the Wampa swats Luke off his Tauntaun in the early moments of The Empire Strikes Back, the puppeteer’s arm had always been briefly visible. New digital hair has been added to cover the puppeteer’s arm, but a strange black triangle now appears in the corner of the shot, likely an artifact of the digital means used to “correct” it. The flashing black triangle draws your eye’s attention more than the blink-and-you’ll-miss-it glimpse of the puppeteer’s arm ever did. How was this not noticed?

Ironically, the only shots in the Original Trilogy that look dated are the new digital effects added for the 1997 Special Editions, which always stuck out like sore thumbs (while replacing so much of the original craftsmanship and ingenuity) and look more obtrusive than ever before at the higher resolution.

Not surprisingly, Lucas has done even more tinkering for the Blu-rays, adding new elements that are asinine in their inconsistency and awkward in their execution. A new pile of digital rocks now obscures R2-D2 while he’s hiding from Tusken Raiders on Tatooine, but they magically disappear when he rolls out of his hiding place. In Return of the Jedi, the door to Jabba the Hutt’s palace when R2 and C-3PO approach has been outrageously magnified in size to the point that it now extends infinitely off the side of the screen, yet interior shots show it to be the same moderate size it’s always been. Oh, my.

Accidentally reversed shots of Boba Fett in Jabba’s throne room in Return of the Jedi still haven’t been correctly swapped, though time and effort (and money) were spent adding new eyes with blinking lids to Episode VI’s Ewoks (and only sometimes to some Ewoks, creating even more inconsistencies).

But the two most glaring and grumble-inducing alterations involve ill-advised vocalizations. The wild and wonderfully inhuman Krayt Dragon call Obi-Wan used in Episode IV to scare away the Tusken Raiders had already been replaced by the silly sound of a Prequel Trilogy beast for the 2004 DVDs, and now it’s been changed yet again for its worst incarnation yet. Rather than sounding like an unearthly bellow made by a cunning, powerful, elderly British man, this new squeal sounds like the warbling, echoing, auto-tuned yelp of a teen boy who just slammed his fingers in a door. A scene once cool and supernatural now sounds glaringly silly.

Also tragically conspicuous are two additions of Darth Vader declaring “NOOOOOO!” at the climax of Return of the Jedi. The original version of this scene is as powerful a silent moment as any character has ever gotten on screen. As the Emperor fries Luke with blasts of Dark Side lightning, Vader looks back and forth between his dying son and his vile master. John Williams’s score and Vader’s posture tell you everything you need to know about his internal conflict and ultimate decision (not to mention the fact that we get the point when Vader picks up the Emperor and chucks him down a reactor shaft). The new exclamations take away the moment’s power and subtly.

All these gripes aside, the picture quality of the Original Trilogy looks pretty fantastic, especially given that these are just recycles of the eight-year-old barely-HD masters. You’ll see colors and details in costumes, sets, and lovingly hand-crafted special effects that you never noticed before, leaving you aching for the original versions all the more.

Audio on all the films is utterly and thoroughly fantastic, correcting many of the most famous mistakes (such as dialed-back music and swapped rear channels) from the 2004 DVDs.

Though the two trilogies are available separately in movies-only sets, the only way to get the special features is to purchase The Complete Saga (which, again, isn’t complete). Say what you will about Episodes I-III (and what I have to say isn’t good), but the deleted scenes alone are worth the price of the full set. Much of the material here will blow you away, particularly the stuff from the Original Trilogy. (Be careful not to miss anything — deleted scenes are arranged by film and by planet rather than having a “play all” option, so it takes some tricky navigating of the menu system to find all the scenes.)

Other extras are as inconsistent as the films’ “fixes.” Several classic documentaries are here, but where are Empire of Dreams and From Star Wars to Jedi (or, for that matter, The Beginning from the Episode I DVD)? A feature on the 501st group of Stormtrooper re-enactors may be exciting for the fans who comprise the 501st, but why drop vital archival material in favor of fan service that caters only to one particular group of fans? Oh, well. I’m willing to forgive a lot thanks to the inclusion of Bill Murray’s hilarious rendition (with his own lyrics) of the Star Wars theme from Saturday Night Live and clips of Luke, Chewbacca, and the droids on The Muppet Show. The infamous Christmas Special doesn’t appear, though its Boba Fett cartoon is included in full.

At the end of the day, the films belong to Lucas and are his to alter and adjust as he pleases. All would be forgiven if he’d just release the original theatrical versions not just for the loyal fans who clamor for them but also for the purpose of preserving them forever in high definition. Scan them, drop them on a Blu-ray, and release them. Lucas could then say, “See? Don’t they look and sound terrible?” And we’d say, “Yeah, maybe a little,” as we passed around the popcorn and celebrated those classic versions with smiles and high-fives. There’s money to be made there, which makes such a release more possible and likely than Lucas might currently lead you to believe. (Not to mention the fact that directors like Steven Spielberg and Ridley Scott make all versions of their films available. Do it, George.)

Star Wars is magical. Especially the Original Trilogy, which endures as a masterwork of imagination brimming with philosophy, adventure, and heart. Yes, this set could have been better. But until Lucas gives us the versions we grew up on, complete with the original craftsmanship he’s wiped away with silly digital tinkering, it’ll do.

MAN OF STEEL’s Zod, Michael Shannon, talks Snyder, Cavill, and character

(I wrote this for Modern Myth Media)

Though he’ll undoubtedly be bringing the full weight of General Zod’s menace and might against Henry Cavill’s Superman in Man of Steel next year, actor Michael Shannon has nothing but nice things to say about his co-star and the film’s director, Zack Snyder.

In a recent interview with The Playlist, Shannon said of Cavill, “Henry is a fantastic Superman. He’s got a little edge to him, and he’s smart, clever, and I had fun working with him.”

But his praise of Snyder is garnering much more attention per Shannon’s comparison of the director to a certain legendary filmmaker.

“I think Zack is the master stylist, visually, I mean he’s up there with Scorsese in my book in terms of visual composition, orchestration, etc.,” he told Playlist writer Christopher Bell, adding that “the whole thing is edgy in a way like when Nolan took over the Batman franchise.”

Being mentioned in the same breath as Martin Scorsese and Christopher Nolan (who’s producing Man of Steel and had a hand in its story) is high praise indeed, and it’s not the first time Shannon has spoken highly of Snyder. Back in September, he told The Province that Snyder is “a prince, one of the sweetest people I’ve ever met in this business. Very warm-hearted individual and very creative.”

And he didn’t stop there, adding, “He doesn’t wear a suit to work, which is nice. He blends in, he likes to feel, to be one of the guys, one of the crew, but he’s able to do that without losing his authority. He doesn’t really crack the whip. He’s friendly, and because he’s friendly, people want to make him happy.”

And in case your inner cynic is secretly wondering if Shannon’s only saying such things because he feels like he has to, his penchant for brutal honesty makes his comments about Cavill and Snyder seem all the more sincere.

Case in point? Shannon recently told Glenn Whipp at Hero Complex that he doesn’t always understand fan culture, can’t even figure out how to read comic books, and doesn’t always get what the characters are talking about. He also says he was “signaled” by the higher-ups at Warner Bros. not to speak so openly about the film’s plot in interviews, which he’s always gladly and cheerfully done.

But don’t think for a moment that Shannon’s not taking the job seriously. From Mr. Whipp’s article:

Which is not to say that Shannon isn’t enjoying himself as Zod. Well … except for the special effects scenes (‘that really ugly green [screen] is everywhere … it starts to slowly drive you insane”) that require him to wear a motion-capture suit (“a unique form of humiliation, I must say”). He’s happy (but, again, a bit baffled) that director Zack Snyder thought of him for the role and more than a little daunted by the prospect of following Terence Stamp’s iconic performance from the Christopher Reeve films in 1978 and 1980.

“Stamp was really smart about it,” Shannon says. “He created a sense of gravity by doing very little. It’s hard to feel like you’re not twirling your mustache when you’re playing a villain. Me and Zack are constantly trying to bring as much variety and complexity as possible. He’s very good about that. No matter what I come up with on the first take, he comes up with a good way to explore it and change it up to keep it interesting. You don’t want it to be: ‘I’m a bad guy. I hate you!’

“One thing we’re doing …” And then Shannon stops himself. “You know, I think I’ve already said too much. I don’t want to be getting another one of those phone calls. I have to go back to work on this Monday …”

It’s dedication like this from Snyder and his team that keeps us Gentlemen here at Modern Myth Media very excited about Man of Steel.

Don’t forget to read Sean Gerber’s superb editorial about Cavill’s casting here and our recent entries in the ever-growing Henry Cavill Kindness Compendium here and here.

Man of Steel is up, up, and away to a theater near you on June 14, 2013!

MAN OF STEEL’s Cavill meets the troops at Edwards Air Force Base

(I originally posted this at Modern Myth Media.)

What better way for a Superman to learn about Truth, Justice, and the American Way than from the brave young men and women who defend those ideals every day?

Edwards Air Force Base just posted an article about a surprise visit Man of Steel star Henry Cavill made to the Airmen there on Tuesday.

Cavill posed for photos and signed autographs for more than 100 Airmen at the Joshua Tree Dining Facility during his break from shooting scenes at the base.

Cavill said of the experience, “I have such great respect for military members and what they do. It’s important that they know how valuable their service is. It is a pleasure to tell them how much they’re appreciated.”

Check out the article by Laura Mowry to read about how the troops were just as appreciative of our new cinematic Superman, who takes flight on the big screen on June 14, 2013!

Regarding DC Comics’ BEFORE WATCHMEN

DC Comics announced yesterday that they’ll be doing a series of prequel comics under the banner Before Watchmen for the classic 1986-1987 series created by writer Alan Moore and artist Dave Gibbons.

(You can see all the covers here.)

Gibbons’s response was … guarded, at best: “The original series of Watchmen is the complete story that Alan Moore and I wanted to tell. However, I appreciate DC’s reasons for this initiative and the wish of the artists and writers involved to pay tribute to our work. May these new additions have the success they desire.”

(“Desire,” not “deserve.” Interesting.)

Moore, however, didn’t pull any punches. He told The New York Times that DC’s plans to continue his work are “completely shameless,” adding, “As far as I know, there weren’t that many prequels or sequels to Moby-Dick.”

And it’s not about the cash: “I don’t want money. What I want is for this not to happen.”

Instead, he says, it’s about the principle: “I tend to take this latest development as a kind of eager confirmation that they are still apparently dependent on ideas that I had 25 years ago.”

And that’s where I think Mr. Moore needs to take a serious “Wait a goddamn minute, pal” pill.

How exactly can Moore take DC to task for mining his ideas from 25 years ago when he himself raided British literature and used other writers’ characters and stories as the basis for The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen?

Worse still, Moore wrote the graphic novel series Lost Girls, in which he took the young female characters of L. Frank Baum (Dorothy from The Wizard of Oz), Lewis Carroll (Alice from Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland), and J.M. Barrie (Wendy from Peter Pan) and put them in graphic sexual situations including rape, incest, and sexual humiliation.

How can he invoke the sanctity of Moby-Dick when he himself has made a lot of money from using other writers’ characters in ways the original writers never intended and most certainly wouldn’t appreciate? Because the content makes a difference, too. The creative teams DC has assembled for these Watchmen prequels will do their best to honor the voices and actions of the Watchmen characters. Was Moore honoring Mr. Hyde by having him rape the Invisible Man to death in The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen? Was he honoring Dorothy or Alice or Wendy by making them victims of sexual depravity?

For me, Watchmen was never a “world” (in the sense that the Marvel Universe is a world or the DC Universe is a world) but rather one big story. It’s all there, it all exists in the confines of itself, it gets richer and deeper and more revealing every time I read it, and there’s no need to explore it further. Moore and Gibbons created a very complete world and presented it on various literary, narrative, and character levels that seamlessly incorporated every different time, voice, and style necessary to tell the tale. It’s a masterpiece of modern literature in that regard, and I’ve never had the slightest interest in reading further adventures of its characters because everything I need has always been in the original text.

On the other hand, the creative teams here have been very carefully chosen to best represent the particular characters they’ll be expanding upon. In the end, I guess the thing that surprises me most about all of this is that DC didn’t do it sooner.

I’m not judging Alan Moore here, and I’m not taking sides, but the whole situation is just brimming with talking points that I’m still mulling over.

In the end, I’d rather see all of these creators simply telling new stories rather than going back to the Watchmen well, but I’ll be keeping a close eye on how all of this develops, and I certainly have a lot of interest in the prequels based solely on the talent involved.

That’s been my issue with DC’s “New 52″ from the start. Why restart everything? Why come up with an event and assign good writers and good artists to it? How about assigning good writers and good artists to your characters and letting their good work be the event?

Oh, well.

What do you think?

(And please be sure to check out the thoughts my friend Mark Hughes posted on his blog at Forbes. Thanks for the mention, Mark!)